|
THE
LINER SHIELD
Much of the
mastitis research in the last fifty years has been directed toward
trying to understand the role of the milking machine in the causation
of this disease. Out of this work has emerged three main mechanisms
of infection that are machine associated. These three mechanisms
are: 1) Transfer of contagious organisms on milk contact surfaces
from one cow to the next. 2) Damage to teat end health and 3) Teat
end impacts with bacteria laden milk droplets due to pressure fronts
or vacuum fluctuation in the unit. This discussion concerns itself
with role of the liner shield in protecting the teat from the consequences
of vacuum fluctuation.
Vacuum fluctuation
has been analyzed to be composed of two principle components: cyclic
and irregular fluctuations. Cyclic vacuum fluctuations are due to
the movement of the liner wall in the normal pulsation cycle and
therefore cannot be completely eliminated in the conventional milking
machine. Use of larger capacity claws, alternating pulsation, claw
venting, larger capacity claws stem and long milk tube drainage
are all design elements that have reduced the magnitude of cyclic
fluctuations.
Irregular vacuum
fluctuations are caused by unplanned events such as pipeline flooding,
a malfunctioning vacuum controller, a milking unit fall off, liner
slipping, and removal of inflations without first shutting off vacuum
to the claw. System design changes (adequately sized pipelines and
vacuum pumps), attention to vacuum controller function (controller
design sophistication and maintenance), as well as emphasis on improved
milker technique, all have helped reduce irregular vacuum fluctuation.
Liner slipping is now probably the most common source of problems
in this area even on newer installations.
|
Experimental
evidence points to the conclusion that vacuum fluctuations
by themselves are not dangerous to the cow unless they cause
aerosols of milk droplets with bacteria to be thrown at and
impact the teat orifice. These teat end impacts can force
bacteria backward through the teat orifice leading to infection
of the gland. It has been shown that these impacts are more
likely to occur when there is a combination of cyclic and
irregular vacuum fluctuation at the end of milking. An example
of this would be to have a liner slip on a front teat at the
same time the liner in a rear teat is going into the opening
phase at the end of milk flow. Indeed it is suspected now
that most of the hazard of over milking is due to increased
opportunity for teat impacts to occur during this vulnerable
period.
In the
late seventies, the National Institutes for Research in Dairying,
in England evaluated various design elements to protect the
teat from impacts. They looked at liner venting, quarter milking
clusters, and liner shielding and measured their effect on
reducing the frequency of teat end impacts.
|
 |
This work indicated
that shields prevented penetration of the teat canal 70% - 90% over
controls. They showed that shields prevented transfer of bacteria
within the cluster to the protected liner about 50% of the time
as did short milk tube air venting. Together, the shield plus the
short milk tube air venting reduced bacterial transfer over 90%.
This compared to 100% prevention for quarter milking claws.
The relative
importance of teat end impacts under commercial conditions in the
U.S. is not known, but it is reasonable to assume that its relative
importance as compared to other mechanisms for causation of mastitis
varies form farm to farm. In field studies in Australia and England
there was a 10% to 50% reduction in the new infection rate in commercial
herds depending on the quality of the installation. Currently there
are no means by which one can determine that benefit of shielding
the liners on any particular herd, other than to put them in and
measure the reduction in the new infection rate.
One final side
benefit of the shield that many users of backflush can appreciate
is the solution to the problem of the "pipe-streaming"
effect. Many people using black rubber liners have not seen this
phenomenon but it is quite apparent in the clear funnel bottom liners.
When back flushing the unit, sometimes the sanitizing solution enters
the bottom of the funnel and pipe-streams part way down the liner
before the solution hits the liner wall. At the mouthpart of liner
it looks like the solution is coming out on all surfaces, but the
base of the liner may not have been touched. The shield can improve
the effectiveness of the backflushing procedure by directing the
sanitizer toward the liner wall starting right at the base of the
liner.
The liner shield
is a clear molded device made of FDA milk contact approved polysulfone.
It easily inserts into the funnel portion of the Silicone Plastics
SP-6000. This device was designed to redirect air movement through
the funnel, without restricting the flow of milk toward the claw.
The proper installation position for the shield is with the elevated
dome portion pointing up toward the teat.
In the SP-6000,
the shield is free to move about inside the funnel cavity and indeed
observing the movement of the shield under milking condition gives
dramatic testimony both to the profound forces in the liner chamber
and hence the need for the shield itself. The free movement of the
shield causes no adverse effects and allows movement of milk around
its edge during milking and of wash water during washing. Problems
with washing have not been observed nor are they expected. Occasionally
the shield may come to rest on a slant within the funnel. This does
not result in any impairment of function provided the funnel is
fully seated on the liner cartridge and the shield is in the proper
upright position. The shield can easily return to its horizontal
position when this happens. There is sufficient clearance between
the edge of the shield and the funnel wall so that even if the shield
has settled in front of the funnel air vent hole, it will not result
in obstruction of the liner vent.
When the milk
is exiting the teat it may hit the dome portion of the shield and
be directed toward the funnel wall above the shield. Some of this
milk will pass by the edge of the shield and run evenly down the
funnel wall below the shield. This can result in a sort of a "white
out" effect on the funnel wall that may be confused with liner
flooding. Liner flooding is a very common event in unvented liners
but will only occur in a vented liner if due to a plugged air vent.
It is easy for experienced SP-6000 users to appreciate the difference
in appearance between the "white out" effect due to the
shield doing its "redirection" function and the "flooding"
of the liner chamber due to a plugged air vent. When on e observes
the shield "floating" up and down with each pulsation
cycle one can assume that the liner is indeed flooded and the vent
needs clearing.
Liner shielding
is a simple, permanent and inexpensive design change that greatly
improves the safety of the milking machine, and all producers should
seriously consider taking advantage of this important tool in mastitis
prevention.
Udder Health
Systems, Inc.
6401 Old Guide Rd
Bellingham, WA 98226
Lab 360-398-1360
|